Defining Singularity # 2

I managed to prove and explain four cosmic keys that build the Universe namely: The Titius Bode Law; The Lagrangian Points, The Roche limit and Coanda Effect Everything in nature in the Universe applies these phenomena in how space forms. The Titius Bode Law: forms the solar planetary layout and annihilates Newtonian dogma that the solar system forms in any way by applying the mass of the planets. The Lagrangian Points: holds material in position to form the rings around planets. The Roche limit removes the idea that stars and planets can collide or crash into each other. This explains amongst so many other things how the Tunguska event took place. The Coanda Effect is a ratio that movement forms between space and material. It forms the Universe in as much as forming stars in spheres and forming galactica in circles. I write this Theses full knowing that I shall never find recognition during my lifetime. That is because physics as it is taught at present and upholding Newtonian views will never admit any standpoint I put forward because if they admit to my views being correct they dismiss their own work as science fantasy, which it is. If the science paternity in physics uses mass as the overall factor that drives the Universe, then they should be able to show where and how the Universe applies mass, not only as Newton declared but also in any form visible. This book rubbishes the idea of something such as mass forming a cosmic factor. Astrophysics is disgracefully a product arrived at by upholding falsified misconception taught as if it is the truth that was never questioned. In my books I introduce what gravity is. Gravity is the difference between outer space that expands due to a lack of movement and material that contract because of movement of the material. Gravity has nothing to do with mass. All I ask is prove to me there is mass in outer space...not weight because that we have on earth as a product of gravity applying. Please show me anything "that pulls" anything "closer" because of mass. If ever my theory of physics is accepted then the current about science must become seen as fiction, which it is. By accepting my view will make every theses written on science this far science fiction, which it is. Academics rejecting my work by ignoring me uphold the fiction they teach as science. I write this Theses full knowing that I shall never find recognition during my lifetime. That is because physics as it is taught at present and upholding Newtonian views will never admit any standpoint I put forward because if they admit to my views being correct they dismiss their own work as science fantasy, which it is. If the science paternity in physics uses mass as the overall factor that drives the Universe, then they should be able to show where and how the Universe applies mass, not only as Newton declared but also in any form visible. This book rubbishes the idea of something such as mass forming a cosmic factor. Astrophysics is disgracefully a product arrived at by upholding falsified misconception taught as if it is the truth that was never questioned. In my books I introduce what gravity is. Gravity is the difference between outer space that expands due to a lack of movement and material that contract because of movement of the material. Gravity has nothing to do with mass. All I ask is prove to me there is mass in outer space...not weight because that we have on earth as a product of gravity applying. Please show me anything "that pulls" anything "closer" because of mass. If ever my theory of physics is accepted then the current about science must become seen as fiction, which it is. By accepting my view will make every theses written on science this far science fiction, which it is. Academics rejecting my work by ignoring me uphold the fiction they teach as science.