World History Book

People live in the present.They plan for and worry about the future.History, however, is the study of the past. Given all the demands that press in from living in the present and anticipating what is yet to come, why bother with what has been? Given all the desirable and available branches of knowledge, why insist as most American educational programs do on a good bit of history? And why urge many students to study even more history than they are required to?Any subject of study needs justification: its advocates must explain why it is worth attention.Most widely accepted subjects and history is certainly one of them attract some people who simply like the information and modes of thought involved. But audiences less spontaneously drawn to the subject and more doubtful about why to bother need to know what the purpose is.Historians do not perform heart transplants, improve highway design, or arrest criminals. In a society that quite correctly expects education to serve useful purposes, the functions of history can seem more difficult to define than those of engineering or medicine. History is in fact very useful, actually indispensable, but the products of historical study are less tangible, sometimes less immediate, than those that stem from some other disciplines.In the past history has been justified for reasons we would no longer accept.For instance, one of the reasons history holds its place in current education is because earlier leaders believed that a knowledge of certain historical facts helped distinguish the educated from the uneducated; the person who could reel off the date of the Norman conquest of England (1066) or the name of the person who came up with the theory of evolution at about the same time that Darwin did (Wallace) was deemed superior a better candidate for law school or even a business promotion.Knowledge of historical facts has been used as a screening device in many societies, from China to the United States, and the habit is still with us to some extent.Unfortunately, this use can encourage mindless memorization a real but not very appealing aspect of the discipline.History should be studied because it is essential to individuals and to society, and because it harbors beauty.There are many ways to discuss the real functions of the subject as there are many different historical talents and many different paths to historical meaning.All definitions of history's utility, however, rely on two fundamental facts.History Helps Us Understand People and Societies.In the first place, history offers a storehouse of information about how people and societies behave. Understanding the operations of people and societies is difficult, though a number of disciplines make the attempt.An exclusive reliance on current data would needlessly handicap our efforts.How can we evaluate war if the nation is at peaceunless we use historical materials? How can we understand genius, the influence of technological innovation, or the role that beliefs play in shaping family life, if we don't use what we know about experiences in the past? Some social scientists attempt to formulate laws or theories about human behavior.But even these recourses depend on historical information, except for in limited, often artificial cases in which experiments can be devised to determine how people act.Major aspects of a society's operation, like mass elections, missionary activities, or military alliances, cannot be set up as precise experiments.Consequently, history must serve, however imperfectly, as our laboratory, and data from the past must serve as our most vital evidence in the unavoidable quest to figure out why our complex species behaves as it does in societal settings.This, fundamentally, is why we cannot stay away from history: it offers the only extensive evidential base for the contemplation and analysis of how societies function, and people need to have some sense of how societies function simply to run their own lives